Subject: rfc1001

From: RFC Editor <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 01:12:39 GMT

Avnish,

We received the comment below regarding RFC 1001.  Please let us know
if this is something that needs to be added to our errata page.  If so,
please formulate the text similar to that found at:

   http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html

Thank you.

RFC Editor

----- Begin Included Message -----

>From [email-masked]  Mon Feb 25 06:36:21 2002
From: "bla bla" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Subject: rfc1001
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:48:46 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0049_01C1BE13.E92A3CC0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-AntiVirus: scanned by AMaViS 0.2.1
Content-Length: 2084

Hi there.

I found something strange in rfc1001
Maybe my code is wrong, but it returns "Tge NetBIOS tame"
instead of "The NetBIOS name" when I try to encode
FEGHGFCAEOGFHEECEJEPFDCAHEGBGNGF

"For example, the NetBIOS name "The NetBIOS name" in the NetBIOS scope
"SCOPE.ID.COM" would be represented at level one by the ASCII

character string:

FEGHGFCAEOGFHEECEJEPFDCAHEGBGNGF.SCOPE.ID.COM"

----- End Included Message -----