<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.43 (Ruby 3.2.3) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-gq-savnet-sav-terms-02" category="info" submissionType="IETF" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.34.0 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="SAV Terminology">Currently Used Terminology Related to Source Address Validation</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-gq-savnet-sav-terms-02"/>
    <author initials="N." surname="Geng" fullname="Nan Geng">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <city>Beijing</city>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>gengnan@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="L." surname="Qin" fullname="Lancheng Qin">
      <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <city>Beijing</city>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>qinlc@zgclab.edu.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2026" month="September" day="04"/>
    <area>Routing</area>
    <workgroup>SAVNET</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 85?>

<t>This document provides an overview of terms and abbreviations related to Source Address Validation (SAV). Its purpose is to establish a common and consistent set of terminology for use across SAV-related discussions and documents. This document explicitly does not serve as an authoritative source of correct terminology.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 89?>

<section anchor="sec-intro">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>This document provides an overview of terms and abbreviations related to Source Address Validation (SAV). Its purpose is to establish a common and consistent set of terminology for use across SAV-related discussions and documents. This document explicitly does not serve as an authoritative source of correct terminology.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-acronyms">
      <name>Acronyms</name>
      <t>The following acronyms are commonly used in the context of source address validation:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>
          <t><strong>ACL:</strong> Access Control List</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>AS:</strong> Autonomous System</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>ASBR:</strong> AS Border Router</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>ASN:</strong> AS Number</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>ASPA:</strong> Autonomous System Provider Authorization</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>BAR-SAV:</strong> Source Address Validation Using BGP UPDATEs, ASPA, and ROA</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>BGP:</strong> Border Gateway Protocol</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>CC:</strong> Customer Cone</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>DSR:</strong> Direct Server Return</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>eBGP:</strong> external Border Gateway Protocol</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>EFP-uRPF:</strong> Enhanced Feasible-Path unicast Reverse Path Forwarding</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>FIB:</strong> Forwarding Information Base</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>FP-uRPF:</strong> Feasible-Path unicast Reverse Path Forwarding</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>HP:</strong> Hidden Prefix</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>IGP:</strong> Interior Gateway Protocol</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>IRR:</strong> Internet Routing Registry</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>IS-IS:</strong> Intermediate System to Intermediate System</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>LPP:</strong> Limited Propagation of a Prefix</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>OSPF:</strong> Open Shortest Path First</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>RIB:</strong> Routing Information Base</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>ROA:</strong> Route Origin Authorization</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>RPKI:</strong> Resource Public Key Infrastructure</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>SAV:</strong> Source Address Validation</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>SAVA:</strong> Source Address Validation Architecture</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>SAVI:</strong> Source Address Validation Improvements</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>SAVNET:</strong> Source Address Validation in Intra-domain and Inter-domain Networks</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>uRPF:</strong> unicast Reverse Path Forwarding</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t><strong>VRF:</strong> Virtual Routing and Forwarding</t>
        </li>
      </ul>
    </section>
    <section anchor="general-terms">
      <name>General Terms</name>
      <section anchor="network-and-topology-terms">
        <name>Network and Topology Terms</name>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t><strong>Autonomous System (AS):</strong> A set of routers under a single technical administration <xref target="RFC4271"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>AS Number (ASN):</strong> A 16-bit <xref target="RFC4271"/> or 32-bit <xref target="RFC6793"/> number uniquely identifying an Autonomous System.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Customer (aka Customer AS):</strong> The customer in a customer-to-provider relationship. A Customer may propagate any route learned from a Customer, or that is locally originated, to a Provider. All other routes must not be propagated <xref target="RFC9234"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Customer Cone (CC):</strong> The Customer Cone of a given AS, denoted as AS-A, includes: (1) AS-A itself, (2) AS-A's direct customers (ASes), (3) The customers of AS-A's direct customers (indirect customers), (4) And so on, recursively, following all chains of provider-to-customer links down the hierarchy <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/><xref target="caida-asrank"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Peer (aka Peer AS or Lateral Peer or Lateral Peer AS):</strong> The peers in a lateral peering relationship. A Peer may propagate any route learned from a Customer, or that is locally originated, to a Peer. All other routes must not be propagated <xref target="RFC9234"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Provider (aka Provider AS):</strong> The provider in a customer-to-provider relationship (if looked at from the opposite direction, provider-to-customer <xref target="caida-asrank"/>). A Provider may propagate any available route to a Customer <xref target="RFC9234"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Provider Cone:</strong> The set of ASes that an AS can reach by using only customer-to-provider links <xref target="I-D.li-sidrops-bicone-sav"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="router-and-interface-terms">
        <name>Router and Interface Terms</name>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t><strong>AS Border Router (ASBR):</strong> The router that connects an AS to other ASes.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Customer Interface (aka Customer-facing Interface):</strong> The interface of an ASBR facing a Customer <xref target="RFC8704"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Edge Router:</strong> The router that is directly connected to a Sub Network or a host <xref target="I-D.geng-idr-bgp-savnet"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Internal Router:</strong> The router that is neither an edge router nor a border router in an AS.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Lateral Peer Interface (aka Lateral Peer-facing Interface):</strong> The interface of an ASBR facing a Lateral Peer <xref target="RFC8704"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Provider Interface (aka Provider-facing Interface):</strong> The interface of an ASBR facing a Provider <xref target="RFC8704"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="routing-terms">
        <name>Routing Terms</name>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t><strong>Asymmetric Routing:</strong> Asymmetric routing means a packet traverses from a source to a destination in one path and takes a different path when it returns to the source. Asymmetric routing can occur within an AS due to routing policy, traffic engineering, etc <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Border Gateway Protocol (BGP):</strong> A path-vector routing protocol used in the global Internet to exchange routing information between different ASes <xref target="RFC4271"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Forwarding Information Base (FIB):</strong> The table containing the information necessary to forward IP Datagrams <xref target="RFC3222"/>. FIB is also known as forwarding table. FIB stores the best active routes, which are a subset of those found in the RIB.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP):</strong> A type of routing protocol used within a single AS to exchange routing information between routers.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS):</strong> A link-state routing protocol belonging to IGP and designed to dynamically exchange routing information within a single AS <xref target="RFC1195"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Open Shortest Path First (OSPF):</strong> Another link-state routing protocol belonging to IGP and designed to dynamically exchange routing information within a single AS <xref target="RFC2328"/><xref target="RFC5340"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Routing Information Base (RIB):</strong> A database within a router or network host that stores routing information. RIB is also known as routing table.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF):</strong> The routing (or forwarding) tables separate from the global routing (or forwarding) table in a router <xref target="RFC4364"/><xref target="RFC8704"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="routing-security-terms">
        <name>Routing Security Terms</name>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t><strong>Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA):</strong> A digitally signed object in the RPKI, that authorizes one or more other ASes as its upstream providers <xref target="I-D.ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Internet Routing Registry (IRR):</strong> A public database which allows Internet service providers to publish and look up Internet number bindings and policy objectives.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Resource holder:</strong>  A legitimate holder of either IP address or AS number resources <xref target="RFC6480"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Resource Public Key infrastructure (RPKI):</strong> A specialized public key infrastructure (PKI) framework to support improved security for the Internet's BGP routing infrastructure <xref target="RFC6480"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Route Origin Authorization (ROA):</strong> A digitally signed object in the RPKI that provides a means of verifying that an IP address block holder has authorized an AS to originate routes to one or more prefixes within the address block <xref target="RFC9582"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="scenario-terms">
        <name>Scenario Terms</name>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t><strong>Direct Server Return (DSR):</strong> A traffic delivery model commonly used by Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) that use anycast service addresses while delivering data from edge locations that do not announce those addresses. In such deployments, a request is received by the anycast server, but the response is sent directly by another server (i.e., the edge server) with the anycast service address as the source address, rather than the address used to reach the edge server. This can create a legitimate hidden-prefix scenario. <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement"/><xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Hidden Prefix (HP):</strong> A prefix that a network does not intend to advertise through routing protocols, but intends to use as a source prefix for legitimate traffic. Such a prefix is hidden from SAV mechanisms that construct SAV Tables solely based on routing information, because the routing information does not indicate that the network can legitimately use the prefix as a source prefix. <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement"/><xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Limited Propagation of a Prefix (LPP):</strong> A scenario in which a Provider does not further propagate a prefix route learned from a Customer to its upstream Provider(s), for example due to NO_EXPORT, NO_ADVERTISE, or other selective-export policies. As a result, an upstream Provider may not receive the prefix route through that path. <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sav-terms">
      <name>SAV Terms</name>
      <section anchor="general-sav-terms">
        <name>General SAV Terms</name>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t><strong>Access Network SAV:</strong> It prevents a host in a network from spoofing the address of another host in the same network segment. Access Network SAV enables source address-granularity of protection <xref target="RFC5210"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Inter-domain SAV (aka Inter-AS SAV):</strong> Inter-domain SAV, defined in the context of Internet routing using BGP-4 <xref target="RFC4271"/>, checks the source addresses of data traffic received from a neighboring Autonomous System (AS), whether that traffic originated within the neighbor's network or is being transited through it. Inter-domain SAV is applied at border routers to incoming traffic on external interfaces directly connected to a neighboring AS. The local AS (SAV performing AS) and the neighbor AS are connected using external BGP (eBGP). The neighbor AS could be using either a public AS number (ASN) or a private ASN [RFC6996]. <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/></t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Intra-domain SAV (aka Intra-AS SAV):</strong> The AS validates the source addresses of data traffic that it originates directly or indirectly. Intra-domain SAV is applied at external interfaces (on routers) facing entities that are not deployed as neighboring ASes and are therefore not covered by inter-domain SAV. For example, an entity can be a single host, a set of hosts, or a customer network with no AS that manages one or more IP prefixes. The entity may source traffic using prefixes assigned by the AS or its own BYOIP prefixes. From the perspective of other ASes, such traffic is originated by the AS. <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement"/></t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>SAV Rule:</strong> The rule that indicates the validity of a specific source IP address or source IP prefix per router interface. It is used by a router to make SAV decisions <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>SAV Table:</strong> The table of prefixes that indicates the validity of a specific source IP address or source IP prefix per interface. Sometimes the terms 'RPF (Reverse Path Forwarding) list' or 'SAV rules' are used interchangeably with 'SAV table' <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Source Address Spoofing (aka Source Address Forgery):</strong> The act of using spoofed source IP addresses assigned to other machines. Malicious actors use IP spoofing to invoke a variety of attacks, including Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, policy evasion, and a range of application-level attacks <xref target="manrs-blog"/>. A spoofed source address can be either IPv4 or IPv6.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Source Address Validation (SAV):</strong> A kind of techniques for the detection and mitigation of Source Address Spoofing <xref target="RFC8704"/>. Routers conduct SAV on data packet in the data plane. SAV focuses on the scenarios of native IP forwarding or IP-encapsulated tunnel (IPsec, GRE, SRv6, etc.). Note that, the SAV mechanisms that the SAVNET working group is interested in should not modify data plane packets <xref target="savnet-charter"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Source Address Validation Architecture (SAVA):</strong> A multiple-fence architecture that takes Access Network SAV, Intra-AS SAV, and inter-AS SAV <xref target="RFC5210"/>. The assumption here is that when access-network SAV is not universally deployed, Intra-AS SAV and Inter-AS SAV can increase the defense in depth by blocking spoofing packets that have entered the network.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Source Address Validation Improvements (SAVI):</strong> A set of access-network SAV mechanisms that provide fine-grained source address validation and prevent nodes attached to the same IP link from spoofing each other's IP addresses <xref target="savi-charter"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Source Address Validation in Intra-domain and Inter-domain Networks (SAVNET):</strong> It refers to both Intra-domain SAV and Inter-domain SAV. The SAVNET working group was created for the evolvement of SAVNET mechanisms <xref target="savnet-charter"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sav-enforcement-terms">
        <name>SAV Enforcement Terms</name>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t><strong>Improper Block (aka False Positive):</strong> The validation results in packets with legitimate source addresses being blocked improperly due to inaccurate SAV rules. (The terms 'improper block' and 'false positive' are used synonymously.) <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement"/><xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Improper Permit (aka False Negative):</strong> The validation results in packets with spoofed source addresses being permitted improperly due to inaccurate SAV rules. (The terms 'improper permit' and 'false negative' are used synonymously.) <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement"/><xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Interface-based Source Prefix Allowlist (aka Source Prefix Allowlist):</strong> A Validation Mode that takes effect on a specific interface. The interface enabling this mode maintains a source prefix list. Only the source addresses encompassed by the source prefixes recorded in the list will be considered valid, otherwise invalid <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Interface-based Source Prefix Blocklist (aka Source Prefix Blocklist):</strong> A Validation Mode that takes effect on a specific interface. The interface enabling this mode maintains a source prefix list. Any source addresses encompassed by the source prefixes recorded in the list will be considered invalid, otherwise valid <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Source Prefix-based Interface Allowlist:</strong> A Validation Mode that takes effect at the router scale. The router enabling this mode will record the source prefixes attached with an interface allowlist. For the packet whose source address is encompassed by a recorded source prefix, the packet is considered valid only when its incoming interface is included in the corresponding interface allowlist. Otherwise, the packet is considered invalid. For the packet whose source address is encompassed by no recorded source prefix, the validity of the packet is unknown <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Source Prefix-based Interface Blocklist:</strong> A Validation Mode that takes effect at the router scale. The router enabling this mode will record the source prefixes attached with an interface blocklist. For the packet whose source address is encompassed by a recorded source prefix, the packet is considered valid only when its incoming interface is not included in the corresponding interface allowlist. Otherwise, the packet is considered invalid. For the packet whose source address is encompassed by no recorded source prefix, the validity of the packet is unknown <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Traffic Handling Policy:</strong> The data plane action taken on the incoming packet after the SAV process on the packet. Besides "Discard", many other actions such as "Permit", "Rate Limit", and "Traffic Redirect" can be chosen and taken for the packet with the invalid state <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Validation Mode:</strong> The mode indicates how SAV Rules are logically organized and used to conduct validation <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sav-mechanism-terms">
        <name>SAV Mechanism Terms</name>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t><strong>Access Control List (ACL) for SAV:</strong> A filter that checks the source address of a data packet against a list of acceptable or unacceptable prefixes <xref target="RFC2827"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>BAR-SAV:</strong> A mechanism that generates source prefix allowlists by using BGP UPDATE messages, ASPA, and ROA <xref target="I-D.ietf-sidrops-bar-sav"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Configuration Information:</strong> This information is configured locally by the AS operator. For example, an AS provisions (suballocates) prefixes p1 and p2 for a non-BGP customer network, which also owns an RIR-allocated prefix p3. The customer instructs the AS to advertise p1 via eBGP on the public Internet, restrict p2 strictly to internal use (in the customer network), and refrain from advertising p3 while still allowing it to source outbound traffic. The AS locally configures these prefixes accordingly. This configuration information is valuable for both intra-domain SAV to permit expected prefixes and inter-domain SAV at other interfaces to block unexpected prefixes. <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/></t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Enhanced Feasible-Path uRPF (EFP-uRPF):</strong> A mechanism that is more flexible about directionality than the FP-uRPF and is for enhancing FP-uRPF in some cases. It is based on the principle that if BGP updates for multiple prefixes with the same origin AS were received on different interfaces (at border routers), then incoming data packets with source addresses in any of those prefixes should be accepted on any of those interfaces <xref target="RFC8704"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Feasible-Path uRPF (FP-uRPF):</strong> An extension of Strict uRPF. Instead of just inserting one best route there, the alternative paths (if any) have been added as well, and are valid for consideration <xref target="RFC3704"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>General SAV Information:</strong> The information that is not specialized for SAV but can be utilized to generate SAV rules, and is initially utilized for other purposes. Currently, the General SAV Information consists of the information from RPKI ROA objects and ASPA objects, local routing information, and the information from IRR data <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-architecture"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Loose uRPF:</strong> A mechanism checks only for the existence of a route (even a default route, if applicable), not where the route points to (At least some implementations of Loose uRPF check where the default route points to) <xref target="RFC3704"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Loose uRPF Ignoring Default Route:</strong> Loose uRPF checks only for the existence of a explicit route (default routes are excluded) <xref target="RFC3704"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>SAV-related Information:</strong> Routing information (e.g., RIBs and FIBs populated by routing protocols or by the local configuration information -- described below -- provided by the AS operator) and objects published in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) that were originally proposed for non-SAV purposes but may also be used for SAV. The RPKI objects include existing RPKI object types (e.g., ROAs and ASPAs) as well as any new types that may be proposed. <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/></t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>SAV-specific Information:</strong> Information dedicated to SAV, which may be defined and exchanged between ASes using potentially new inter-AS communication protocol or an extension of an existing protocol. The information may also take the form of new RPKI object type(s). It may also come from the local configuration information provided by the AS operator. <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement"/></t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Source Entity (aka Source Router or Source AS):</strong> The Entity (Router/AS) that propagates its SAV-specific information to Validation Entity (Router/AS) <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-architecture"/><xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-architecture"/>. Source Entity is the producer of SAV-specific information.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Strict unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF):</strong> A mechanism that uses FIB for SAV. An ingress packet is accepted only if the FIB contains a prefix that encompasses the source address and forwarding information for that prefix points back to the interface over which the packet was received <xref target="RFC3704"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>Validation Entity (aka Validation Router or Validation AS):</strong> The Entity (Router/AS) that receives SAV-specific information from Source Entity (Router/AS) <xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-architecture"/><xref target="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-architecture"/>. Validation Entity is the consumer of SAV-specific information.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t><strong>VRF uRPF:</strong> A mechanism that takes SAV based on VRF table instead of FIB. The specific routes received from external BGP peers will be stored in a dedicated VRF table. VRF uRPF can be implemented to support the strict mode like Strict uRPF or the loose mode like Loose uRPF <xref target="RFC8704"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-security">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>This document provides an overview of terms and abbreviations related to SAV and does not have security considerations.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-iana">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>This document does not require any IANA actions.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references anchor="sec-informative-references">
      <name>Informative References</name>
      <reference anchor="RFC1195" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1195" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1195.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and dual environments</title>
          <author fullname="R. Callon" initials="R." surname="Callon"/>
          <date month="December" year="1990"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This memo specifies an integrated routing protocol, based on the OSI Intra-Domain IS-IS Routing Protocol, which may be used as an interior gateway protocol (IGP) to support TCP/IP as well as OSI. This allows a single routing protocol to be used to support pure IP environments, pure OSI environments, and dual environments. This specification was developed by the IS-IS working group of the Internet Engineering Task Force. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1195"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC1195"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC2328" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2328" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2328.xml">
        <front>
          <title>OSPF Version 2</title>
          <author fullname="J. Moy" initials="J." surname="Moy"/>
          <date month="April" year="1998"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This memo documents version 2 of the OSPF protocol. OSPF is a link- state routing protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="STD" value="54"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2328"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2328"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC2827" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2827" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2827.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing</title>
          <author fullname="P. Ferguson" initials="P." surname="Ferguson"/>
          <author fullname="D. Senie" initials="D." surname="Senie"/>
          <date month="May" year="2000"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This paper discusses a simple, effective, and straightforward method for using ingress traffic filtering to prohibit DoS (Denial of Service) attacks which use forged IP addresses to be propagated from 'behind' an Internet Service Provider's (ISP) aggregation point. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="38"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2827"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2827"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC3222" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3222" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3222.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Terminology for Forwarding Information Base (FIB) based Router Performance</title>
          <author fullname="G. Trotter" initials="G." surname="Trotter"/>
          <date month="December" year="2001"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document describes the terms to be used in a methodology that determines the IP packet forwarding performance of IP routers as a function of the forwarding information base installed within a router. The forwarding performance of an IP router may be dependent upon or may be linked to the composition and size of the forwarding information base installed within a router. This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3222"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3222"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC3704" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3704" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3704.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Ingress Filtering for Multihomed Networks</title>
          <author fullname="F. Baker" initials="F." surname="Baker"/>
          <author fullname="P. Savola" initials="P." surname="Savola"/>
          <date month="March" year="2004"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>BCP 38, RFC 2827, is designed to limit the impact of distributed denial of service attacks, by denying traffic with spoofed addresses access to the network, and to help ensure that traffic is traceable to its correct source network. As a side effect of protecting the Internet against such attacks, the network implementing the solution also protects itself from this and other attacks, such as spoofed management access to networking equipment. There are cases when this may create problems, e.g., with multihoming. This document describes the current ingress filtering operational mechanisms, examines generic issues related to ingress filtering, and delves into the effects on multihoming in particular. This memo updates RFC 2827. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="84"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3704"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3704"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC4271" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4271.xml">
        <front>
          <title>A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)</title>
          <author fullname="Y. Rekhter" initials="Y." role="editor" surname="Rekhter"/>
          <author fullname="T. Li" initials="T." role="editor" surname="Li"/>
          <author fullname="S. Hares" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Hares"/>
          <date month="January" year="2006"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document discusses the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), which is an inter-Autonomous System routing protocol.</t>
            <t>The primary function of a BGP speaking system is to exchange network reachability information with other BGP systems. This network reachability information includes information on the list of Autonomous Systems (ASes) that reachability information traverses. This information is sufficient for constructing a graph of AS connectivity for this reachability from which routing loops may be pruned, and, at the AS level, some policy decisions may be enforced.</t>
            <t>BGP-4 provides a set of mechanisms for supporting Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR). These mechanisms include support for advertising a set of destinations as an IP prefix, and eliminating the concept of network "class" within BGP. BGP-4 also introduces mechanisms that allow aggregation of routes, including aggregation of AS paths.</t>
            <t>This document obsoletes RFC 1771. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4271"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4271"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC4364" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4364" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4364.xml">
        <front>
          <title>BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)</title>
          <author fullname="E. Rosen" initials="E." surname="Rosen"/>
          <author fullname="Y. Rekhter" initials="Y." surname="Rekhter"/>
          <date month="February" year="2006"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document describes a method by which a Service Provider may use an IP backbone to provide IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) for its customers. This method uses a "peer model", in which the customers' edge routers (CE routers) send their routes to the Service Provider's edge routers (PE routers); there is no "overlay" visible to the customer's routing algorithm, and CE routers at different sites do not peer with each other. Data packets are tunneled through the backbone, so that the core routers do not need to know the VPN routes. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4364"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4364"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC5210" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5210" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5210.xml">
        <front>
          <title>A Source Address Validation Architecture (SAVA) Testbed and Deployment Experience</title>
          <author fullname="J. Wu" initials="J." surname="Wu"/>
          <author fullname="J. Bi" initials="J." surname="Bi"/>
          <author fullname="X. Li" initials="X." surname="Li"/>
          <author fullname="G. Ren" initials="G." surname="Ren"/>
          <author fullname="K. Xu" initials="K." surname="Xu"/>
          <author fullname="M. Williams" initials="M." surname="Williams"/>
          <date month="June" year="2008"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>Because the Internet forwards packets according to the IP destination address, packet forwarding typically takes place without inspection of the source address and malicious attacks have been launched using spoofed source addresses. In an effort to enhance the Internet with IP source address validation, a prototype implementation of the IP Source Address Validation Architecture (SAVA) was created and an evaluation was conducted on an IPv6 network. This document reports on the prototype implementation and the test results, as well as the lessons and insights gained from experimentation. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5210"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5210"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC5340" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5340" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5340.xml">
        <front>
          <title>OSPF for IPv6</title>
          <author fullname="R. Coltun" initials="R." surname="Coltun"/>
          <author fullname="D. Ferguson" initials="D." surname="Ferguson"/>
          <author fullname="J. Moy" initials="J." surname="Moy"/>
          <author fullname="A. Lindem" initials="A." surname="Lindem"/>
          <date month="July" year="2008"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document describes the modifications to OSPF to support version 6 of the Internet Protocol (IPv6). The fundamental mechanisms of OSPF (flooding, Designated Router (DR) election, area support, Short Path First (SPF) calculations, etc.) remain unchanged. However, some changes have been necessary, either due to changes in protocol semantics between IPv4 and IPv6, or simply to handle the increased address size of IPv6. These modifications will necessitate incrementing the protocol version from version 2 to version 3. OSPF for IPv6 is also referred to as OSPF version 3 (OSPFv3).</t>
            <t>Changes between OSPF for IPv4, OSPF Version 2, and OSPF for IPv6 as described herein include the following. Addressing semantics have been removed from OSPF packets and the basic Link State Advertisements (LSAs). New LSAs have been created to carry IPv6 addresses and prefixes. OSPF now runs on a per-link basis rather than on a per-IP-subnet basis. Flooding scope for LSAs has been generalized. Authentication has been removed from the OSPF protocol and instead relies on IPv6's Authentication Header and Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP).</t>
            <t>Even with larger IPv6 addresses, most packets in OSPF for IPv6 are almost as compact as those in OSPF for IPv4. Most fields and packet- size limitations present in OSPF for IPv4 have been relaxed. In addition, option handling has been made more flexible.</t>
            <t>All of OSPF for IPv4's optional capabilities, including demand circuit support and Not-So-Stubby Areas (NSSAs), are also supported in OSPF for IPv6. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5340"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5340"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC6480" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6480" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6480.xml">
        <front>
          <title>An Infrastructure to Support Secure Internet Routing</title>
          <author fullname="M. Lepinski" initials="M." surname="Lepinski"/>
          <author fullname="S. Kent" initials="S." surname="Kent"/>
          <date month="February" year="2012"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document describes an architecture for an infrastructure to support improved security of Internet routing. The foundation of this architecture is a Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) that represents the allocation hierarchy of IP address space and Autonomous System (AS) numbers; and a distributed repository system for storing and disseminating the data objects that comprise the RPKI, as well as other signed objects necessary for improved routing security. As an initial application of this architecture, the document describes how a legitimate holder of IP address space can explicitly and verifiably authorize one or more ASes to originate routes to that address space. Such verifiable authorizations could be used, for example, to more securely construct BGP route filters. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6480"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6480"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC6793" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6793" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6793.xml">
        <front>
          <title>BGP Support for Four-Octet Autonomous System (AS) Number Space</title>
          <author fullname="Q. Vohra" initials="Q." surname="Vohra"/>
          <author fullname="E. Chen" initials="E." surname="Chen"/>
          <date month="December" year="2012"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>The Autonomous System number is encoded as a two-octet entity in the base BGP specification. This document describes extensions to BGP to carry the Autonomous System numbers as four-octet entities. This document obsoletes RFC 4893 and updates RFC 4271. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6793"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6793"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC8704" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8704" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8704.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Enhanced Feasible-Path Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding</title>
          <author fullname="K. Sriram" initials="K." surname="Sriram"/>
          <author fullname="D. Montgomery" initials="D." surname="Montgomery"/>
          <author fullname="J. Haas" initials="J." surname="Haas"/>
          <date month="February" year="2020"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document identifies a need for and proposes improvement of the unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) techniques (see RFC 3704) for detection and mitigation of source address spoofing (see BCP 38). Strict uRPF is inflexible about directionality, the loose uRPF is oblivious to directionality, and the current feasible-path uRPF attempts to strike a balance between the two (see RFC 3704). However, as shown in this document, the existing feasible-path uRPF still has shortcomings. This document describes enhanced feasible-path uRPF (EFP-uRPF) techniques that are more flexible (in a meaningful way) about directionality than the feasible-path uRPF (RFC 3704). The proposed EFP-uRPF methods aim to significantly reduce false positives regarding invalid detection in source address validation (SAV). Hence, they can potentially alleviate ISPs' concerns about the possibility of disrupting service for their customers and encourage greater deployment of uRPF techniques. This document updates RFC 3704.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="84"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8704"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8704"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC9234" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9234" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9234.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Route Leak Prevention and Detection Using Roles in UPDATE and OPEN Messages</title>
          <author fullname="A. Azimov" initials="A." surname="Azimov"/>
          <author fullname="E. Bogomazov" initials="E." surname="Bogomazov"/>
          <author fullname="R. Bush" initials="R." surname="Bush"/>
          <author fullname="K. Patel" initials="K." surname="Patel"/>
          <author fullname="K. Sriram" initials="K." surname="Sriram"/>
          <date month="May" year="2022"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>Route leaks are the propagation of BGP prefixes that violate assumptions of BGP topology relationships, e.g., announcing a route learned from one transit provider to another transit provider or a lateral (i.e., non-transit) peer or announcing a route learned from one lateral peer to another lateral peer or a transit provider. These are usually the result of misconfigured or absent BGP route filtering or lack of coordination between autonomous systems (ASes). Existing approaches to leak prevention rely on marking routes by operator configuration, with no check that the configuration corresponds to that of the External BGP (eBGP) neighbor, or enforcement of the two eBGP speakers agreeing on the peering relationship. This document enhances the BGP OPEN message to establish an agreement of the peering relationship on each eBGP session between autonomous systems in order to enforce appropriate configuration on both sides. Propagated routes are then marked according to the agreed relationship, allowing both prevention and detection of route leaks.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9234"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9234"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC9582" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9582" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9582.xml">
        <front>
          <title>A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)</title>
          <author fullname="J. Snijders" initials="J." surname="Snijders"/>
          <author fullname="B. Maddison" initials="B." surname="Maddison"/>
          <author fullname="M. Lepinski" initials="M." surname="Lepinski"/>
          <author fullname="D. Kong" initials="D." surname="Kong"/>
          <author fullname="S. Kent" initials="S." surname="Kent"/>
          <date month="May" year="2024"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document defines a standard profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs). A ROA is a digitally signed object that provides a means of verifying that an IP address block holder has authorized an Autonomous System (AS) to originate routes to one or more prefixes within the address block. This document obsoletes RFC 6482.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9582"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9582"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-26" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Problem Statement, Gap Analysis, and Requirements for Intra-domain Source Address Validation</title>
          <author fullname="Lancheng Qin" initials="L." surname="Qin">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dan Li" initials="D." surname="Li">
            <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jianping Wu" initials="J." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Mingqing(Michael) Huang" initials="M." surname="Huang">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Nan Geng" initials="N." surname="Geng">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="1" month="June" year="2026"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>Source address validation (SAV) is an important means to mitigate IP source address spoofing [RFC2827]. This document analyzes the gaps in current operational mechanisms for intra-domain SAV. It also identifies the properties that new intra-domain SAV mechanisms are expected to provide.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-problem-statement-26"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement-21" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Problem Statement, Gap Analysis, and Requirements for Inter-Domain Source Address Validation</title>
          <author fullname="Dan Li" initials="D." surname="Li">
            <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Lancheng Qin" initials="L." surname="Qin">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Libin Liu" initials="L." surname="Liu">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Mingqing(Michael) Huang" initials="M." surname="Huang">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Kotikalapudi Sriram" initials="K." surname="Sriram">
            <organization>USA National Institute of Standards and Technology</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="19" month="July" year="2026"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document analyzes the problem space and provides a gap analysis of existing inter-domain source address validation (SAV) mechanisms. Based on these findings, it outlines the technical requirements for future improvements.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement-21"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-architecture" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-architecture-04" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-savnet-intra-domain-architecture.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Intra-domain Source Address Validation Architecture</title>
          <author fullname="Dan Li" initials="D." surname="Li">
            <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jianping Wu" initials="J." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Lancheng Qin" initials="L." surname="Qin">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Nan Geng" initials="N." surname="Geng">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Li Chen" initials="L." surname="Chen">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="29" month="June" year="2026"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document describes a generic architecture for intra-domain Source Address Validation (SAV). It provides a common framework for developing new intra-domain SAV mechanisms and describes the conditions under which such mechanisms can improve SAV accuracy with respect to existing intra-domain SAV mechanisms.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-savnet-intra-domain-architecture-04"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-architecture" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-savnet-inter-domain-architecture-03" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-architecture.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Inter-domain Source Address Validation (SAVNET) Architecture</title>
          <author fullname="Dan Li" initials="D." surname="Li">
            <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Li Chen" initials="L." surname="Chen">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Nan Geng" initials="N." surname="Geng">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Libin Liu" initials="L." surname="Liu">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Lancheng Qin" initials="L." surname="Qin">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="1" month="March" year="2026"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document introduces an inter-domain SAVNET architecture for performing AS-level SAV and provides a comprehensive framework for guiding the design of inter-domain SAV mechanisms. The proposed architecture empowers ASes to generate SAV rules by sharing SAV- specific information between themselves, which can be used to generate more accurate and trustworthy SAV rules in a timely manner compared to the general information. During the incremental or partial deployment of SAV-specific information, it can utilize general information to generate SAV rules, if an AS's SAV-specific information is unavailable. Rather than delving into protocol extensions or implementations, this document primarily concentrates on proposing SAV-specific and general information and guiding how to utilize them to generate SAV rules. To this end, it also defines some architectural components and their relations.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-savnet-inter-domain-architecture-03"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities-03" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities.xml">
        <front>
          <title>General Source Address Validation Capabilities</title>
          <author fullname="Mingqing(Michael) Huang" initials="M." surname="Huang">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Weiqiang Cheng" initials="W." surname="Cheng">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dan Li" initials="D." surname="Li">
            <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Nan Geng" initials="N." surname="Geng">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Li Chen" initials="L." surname="Chen">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="21" month="June" year="2026"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>The SAV rules of existing source address validation (SAV) mechanisms are derived from other core data structures (e.g., FIB-based uRPF) that are not dedicatedly designed for source filtering. Consequently, these mechanisms have limitations in deployable scenarios and traffic handling policies. To overcome these limitations, this document introduces general SAV capabilities from a data plane perspective. How to implement the capabilities and how to generate SAV rules are not in the scope of this document.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-savnet-general-sav-capabilities-03"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile-29" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile.xml">
        <front>
          <title>A Profile for Autonomous System Provider Authorization</title>
          <author fullname="Job Snijders" initials="J." surname="Snijders">
            <organization>BSD Software Development</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Alexander Azimov" initials="A." surname="Azimov">
            <organization>Yandex</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Eugene Uskov" initials="E." surname="Uskov">
            <organization>JetLend</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Randy Bush" initials="R." surname="Bush">
            <organization>Internet Initiative Japan</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Russ Housley" initials="R." surname="Housley">
            <organization>Vigil Security, LLC</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Ben Maddison" initials="B." surname="Maddison">
            <organization>Workonline</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="29" month="July" year="2026"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document defines a Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) protected content type for Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA) objects for use with the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI). An ASPA is a digitally signed object through which the issuer (the holder of an Autonomous System identifier), can authorize one or more other Autonomous Systems (ASes) as its transit providers. When validated, an ASPA's eContent can be used for detection and mitigation of route leaks.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile-29"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.geng-idr-bgp-savnet" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-geng-idr-bgp-savnet-06" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.geng-idr-bgp-savnet.xml">
        <front>
          <title>BGP Extensions for Source Address Validation Networks (BGP SAVNET)</title>
          <author fullname="Nan Geng" initials="N." surname="Geng">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhenbin Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhen Tan" initials="Z." surname="Tan">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Mingxing Liu" initials="" surname="Liu">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dan Li" initials="D." surname="Li">
            <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="24" month="March" year="2026"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>Many source address validation (SAV) mechanisms have been proposed for preventing source address spoofing. However, existing SAV mechanisms are faced with the problems of inaccurate validation or high operational overhead in some scenarios. This document proposes BGP SAVNET by extending BGP protocol for SAV. This protocol can propagate SAV-related information through BGP messages. The propagated information will help edge/border routers automatically generate accurate SAV rules. These rules construct a validation boundary for the network and help check the validity of source addresses of arrival data packets.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-geng-idr-bgp-savnet-06"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.li-sidrops-bicone-sav" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-sidrops-bicone-sav-07" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.li-sidrops-bicone-sav.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Bicone Source Address Validation</title>
          <author fullname="Lancheng Qin" initials="L." surname="Qin">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dan Li" initials="D." surname="Li">
            <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Li Chen" initials="L." surname="Chen">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Libin Liu" initials="L." surname="Liu">
            <organization>Zhongguancun Laboratory</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="7" month="July" year="2025"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>The primary design goal of source address validation (SAV) is avoiding improper blocks (i.e., blocking legitimate traffic) while maintaining directionality (see [I-D.ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement] and [RFC8704]). Existing advanced SAV solutions (e.g., EFP-uRPF [RFC8704]) for an Autonomous System (AS) typically generate ingress SAV allowlist filters on interfaces facing a customer or lateral peer AS. This document analyzes the potential improper block problems when using an allowlist. To avoid improper blocks, this document proposes a new SAV solution by generating an ingress SAV blocklist filter which contains prefixes exclusively belonging to the provider cone. In practice, network operators can flexibly decide to use a blocklist or an allowlist according to their requirements and actual conditions.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-li-sidrops-bicone-sav-07"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-sidrops-bar-sav" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sidrops-bar-sav-10" xml:base="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-sidrops-bar-sav.xml">
        <front>
          <title>Source Address Validation Using BGP UPDATEs, ASPA, and ROA (BAR-SAV)</title>
          <author fullname="Kotikalapudi Sriram" initials="K." surname="Sriram">
            <organization>USA National Institute of Standards and Technology</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Igor Lubashev" initials="I." surname="Lubashev">
            <organization>Akamai Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Doug Montgomery" initials="D." surname="Montgomery">
            <organization>USA National Institute of Standards and Technology</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="19" month="July" year="2026"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>Designing an efficient source address validation (SAV) filter requires minimizing false positives (i.e., avoiding blocking legitimate traffic) while maintaining directionality (see RFC8704). This document advances the technology for SAV filter design through a method that makes use of BGP UPDATE messages, Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA), and Route Origin Authorization (ROA). The proposed method's name is abbreviated as BAR-SAV. BAR-SAV can be used by network operators to derive more robust SAV filters and thus improve network resilience. This document updates RFC8704.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-sidrops-bar-sav-10"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="caida-asrank" target="https://asrank.caida.org/about">
        <front>
          <title>CAIDA AS Rank</title>
          <author>
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2025" month="August"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="manrs-blog" target="https://manrs.org/2023/04/why-is-source-address-validation-still-a-problem">
        <front>
          <title>Why is Source Address Validation Still a Problem?</title>
          <author>
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2023" month="April"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="savnet-charter" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/savnet/about">
        <front>
          <title>Charter for SAVNET Working Group</title>
          <author>
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2023" month="March"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="savi-charter" target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/savi/about/">
        <front>
          <title>Charter for SAVI Working Group</title>
          <author>
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2008" month="July"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
    </references>
    <?line 305?>



  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
